Saturday, March 17, 2007

Dear AmtrakMatt

AmtrakMatt Today, 12:08 PM Post #258

EGG HEAD

Group: Moderator
Posts: 8,193
Joined: 16-August 05
From: Erie Lackawanna country in upstate NY
Member No.: 1,683

QUOTE(Holmey @ Mar 16 2007, 10:22 PM)
She called the police on me because she disagreed about ANS


The heart of the matter. Seni was acting out of revenge, IMO. She wanted to punish you for a transgression and chose a course of action that was just plain wrong in itself.



You sir, refused to listen to both sides of the story and now prostitute yourself to stay in favor with Holmey. Remember, you didn't want to hear my side of this.

As moderator you have often taken actions as a result of harrassment. Tell me, dear Amtrak, how often a poster has to harrass someone until you take action? Once? Twice? Three times? Or do you expect one warning to suffice?

1 - He did not call when we agreed, did not want to "discuss" and later lied on the board and said I was playing a victim and didn't want to talk.

2 - He called late at night when I had no intention of talking. (He also didn't ask on that one. The calls came without warning) We agreed to "edit" two posts and he pulled the thread, claiming I agreed to it. Another lie.

3 - He called again AFTER being told not to. Now you tell me, Matt, how often does someone have to warn another before their own personal sanctuary - their home - is not in danger of being violated? On the board it would be ONE warning. I gave Holmey SEVERAL.

On the first call I said DO NOT CALL to berated me. If you want to discuss that's something else.

After the second call I posted ON THE BOARD - DO NOT CALL ME. Since he replied to one of those posts he can't claim ignorance even tho he tried.

On the third call - AFTER he was repeated warned - he still didn't have the common sense that God gave a goose and started spouting after I told him I did not wish to talk to him.

You're a hypocrite, Matt. You were so freaked out over a suggestion of a phone call that you refused to answer yet you seem to believe it's okay that Holmey makes unwanted calls. You didn't want them yourself yet its ok for The Prince to make them. That makes you a hypocrite. And now you've joined the liars club.

My making a report with the police on James Holms (wonder if that googles now) had nothing to do with dialogue over the ANS debacle as much as y'all wish it did. It was completely and solely over phone calls that I deem were harrassing and berating as well as being unwanted. The first one he had permission for, NOT the others.

What don't you get now?

**************


Speaking of getting it
Lila, you're clueless. Completely and totally lacking in comprehension.
btw
If you're married to some sort of spy person and have two kids, why'd you sign up at a singles website as Lilalove and claim to be unmarried?

Dear Lila, we knew it was you because you, lacking the common sense of a flea, posted your picture. What does it hurt? Does it hurt your family? Your husband? Does he know? Proves one thing: You lied. One place or the other is full of false information. It's an interesting discovery. You have enjoyed calling me all sorts of names when I can't defend myself. Enjoy the feeling of silence.

And LIEla
That "old profile" you filled out was in JANUARY of 2007. THIS year. Try again, dear.
You LIED. One can only wonder why a professed married woman would fill out so many profiles claiming to be single. It doesn't default, Lila.

You have no one but yourself to blame for this attention. You wanted it. You got it. Continue to dance, dear.

http://www.profile.com/Lilalove

Last Online: Jan 15, 2007
Date Joined: Jan 15, 2007

Country:
- Canada
State/Province: Ontario

Status: Single
Sex: Female
Age: 27
Sexuality: Straight

and this...definitely not the (racial slur deleted) husband you mentioned
http://www.profile.com//userimg/400/img45ac071410e10.jpg

Liiiiiiila
You forgot to tell your syncophant that you had posted a picture of yourself on the ESS boards. Yes, dear, we remember. It is you.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home