Sunday, March 26, 2006

NCLB - Education's Worst Nightmare

Here's what will happen with Bush's educational blackmail. There will be no artists, no musicians, no original thinkers to dream of the solutions. No scientists who will cure the worst of our ills. No visionaries and diplomats that know the world and can bring peace. Some students see their schedules whittled down to two subjects?? Their love of learning, sometimes sparked by classes now threatened, will leave. In it's place will be a non achieving drone with no desire to excel. And the worst part is that no one has done the math, created the study, to see if there is an actual improvement with these draconian measures.

Teachers have always been challenged to help children read. More attention needs to be placed on education at home, I firmly believe that, including parents who give a child a book to read (or better - reads with them) instead of letting him turn on the TV or computer.

The system is using educational blackmail in hopes that the under achiever will be motivated by punishment to get back to the courses they love.

Bush has not only done tremendous harm to our nation, he's also set education on a path to incompetency.

http://nytimes.com/2006/03/26/education/26child.html

Schools from Vermont to California are increasing — in some cases tripling — the class time that low-proficiency students spend on reading and math, mainly because the federal law, signed in 2002, requires annual exams only in those subjects and punishes schools that fall short of rising benchmarks.

The survey, by the Center on Education Policy, found that since the passage of the federal law, 71 percent of the nation's 15,000 school districts had reduced the hours of instructional time spent on history, music and other subjects to open up more time for reading and math. The center is an independent group that has made a thorough study of the new act and has published a detailed yearly report on the implementation of the law in dozens of districts.

About 125 of the school's lowest-performing students are barred from taking anything except math, reading and gym, a measure that Samuel Harris, a former lieutenant colonel in the Army who is the school's principal, said was draconian but necessary. "When you look at a kid and you know he can't read, that's a tough call you've got to make," Mr. Harris said.

"Because of its emphasis on testing and accountability in particular subjects, it apparently forces some school districts down narrow intellectual paths," Dr. Reese said. "If a subject is not tested, why teach it?"

The historian David McCullough told a Senate Committee last June that because of the law, "history is being put on the back burner or taken off the stove altogether in many or most schools, in favor of math and reading."

The report says that at districts in Colorado, Texas, Vermont, California, Nebraska and elsewhere, math and reading are squeezing other subjects. At one district cited, the Bayonne City Schools in New Jersey, low-performing ninth graders will be barred from taking Spanish, music or any other elective next fall so they can take extra periods of math and reading, said Ellen O'Connor, an assistant superintendent.

"We're using that as a motivation," Dr. O'Connor said. "We're hoping they'll concentrate on their math and reading so they can again participate in some course they love."

6 Comments:

At 12:06 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

School "experts" always use the comparison how students in other nations do when put next to ours. We always come out 2nd best or worse. They are comparing apples and oranges. Here in the states we strive to educate EVEYBODY on the same level. In other countries a determination is made at a cetain grade level (8th? 9th?). Score below a certain level, you go to learn a trade. Score above and you move on to "college prep". If you figure that, for example, 40% of students in another country score above the cutoff. We should be comparing the top 40% of OUR students to thiers. Now lets compare and see where we are. I would wager the difference will be much less, if we don't excell.

 
At 2:23 PM, Blogger Senihele said...

Very true.
The "experts" are also not willing to look at the teacher/pupil time ratios. Our system was compared with, I believe, Japan a few years ago and the comparison deemed us lacking yet Japanese teachers spend only half their day in class, the other half is spent preparing the lesson. American "experts" feel like 30 minuntes a day to prepare sometimes 10 and 12 classes is adequate. The problem is they believe teachers aren't working unless they're supervising kids.

There are so many problems in our system but most of them can be tracked directly back to "the expects" who have limited or no experience with the classroom.

 
At 3:18 PM, Blogger Ross said...

These "experts" came in and said that NCLB was "scientifically based" and no one ever questioned that. I am a teacher, and I can tell you, our focus is so intense on reading, writing, and math, that we have to scrounge to find time (and more and more, resources) to teach social studies and science. The sad thing is, NCLB is not scientifically based, it's simply an excuse for the government to reform education. The standards being set forth, no matter how you look at them, are unrealistic if not impossible to reach. No Child Left Behind will, in the future, be known as Bush's biggest failure in office, and believe me, that's saying a lot.

 
At 3:21 PM, Blogger Senihele said...

If what they're doing can be termed "reform". I see it as a means to cut educational spending. Already Bush's 2007 budget cuts spending for headstart and school lunch programs. He has an agenda with education but I don't believe it's obvious yet just what that agenda is.

I would be willing to bet your arts programs have been gutted.

 
At 7:00 PM, Blogger Ross said...

I know I commented on this post already, but I'm back with more thoughts. I post quite often on educational matters. I'm a 5th grade teacher and an NEA member (proud of it too!).
I laid out some things about NCLB in my January 15th post.
I also posted today on some issues within education. Anyways, back to your post. I think that NCLB is a witch hunt. It's done knowing that less than 2% of schools will be meeting AYP by 2015. Then, government can step in and have their way with it. It's just sad, and I agree with you, Bush has come in here and ripped our country apart. The bad thing is, I voted for him, TWICE! I'm so ashamed of this, he's a complete and utter failure.

 
At 10:43 AM, Blogger Senihele said...

A better mousetrap. Each new administration has to have one for education. Don't you think it's ironic that they choose to tell teachers what's wrong with the process rather than listening to teachers offer opinions on how education can be facillitated.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home